Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1606069
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely |
| Date | 2017-03-22 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnBei-1OD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tmJnz-6kS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tmJnz-6kS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tndvk-2mG-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The way the schedutil governor uses the PELT metric causes it to
underestimate the CPU utilization in some cases.
That can be easily demonstrated by running kernel compilation on
a Sandy Bridge Intel processor, running turbostat in parallel with
it and looking at the values written to the MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL
register. Namely, the expected result would be that when all CPUs
were 100% busy, all of them would be requested to run in the maximum
P-state, but observation shows that this clearly isn't the case.
The CPUs run in the maximum P-state for a while and then are
requested to run slower and go back to the maximum P-state after
a while again. That causes the actual frequency of the processor to
visibly oscillate below the sustainable maximum in a jittery fashion
which clearly is not desirable.
That has been attributed to CPU utilization metric updates on task
migration that cause the total utilization value for the CPU to be
reduced by the utilization of the migrated task. If that happens,
the schedutil governor may see a CPU utilization reduction and will
attempt to reduce the CPU frequency accordingly right away. That
may be premature, though, for example if the system is generally
busy and there are other runnable tasks waiting to be run on that
CPU already.
This is unlikely to be an issue on systems where cpufreq policies are
shared between multiple CPUs, because in those cases the policy
utilization is computed as the maximum of the CPU utilization values
over the whole policy and if that turns out to be low, reducing the
frequency for the policy most likely is a good idea anyway. On
systems with one CPU per policy, however, it may affect performance
adversely and even lead to increased energy consumption in some cases.
On those systems it may be addressed by taking another utilization
metric into consideration, like whether or not the CPU whose
frequency is about to be reduced has been idle recently, because if
that's not the case, the CPU is likely to be busy in the near future
and its frequency should not be reduced.
To that end, use the counter of idle calls in the timekeeping code.
Namely, make the schedutil governor look at that counter for the
current CPU every time before its frequency is about to be reduced.
If the counter has not changed since the previous iteration of the
governor computations for that CPU, the CPU has been busy for all
that time and its frequency should not be decreased, so if the new
frequency would be lower than the one set previously, the governor
will skip the frequency update.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
include/linux/tick.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
unsigned long util;
unsigned long max;
unsigned int flags;
+
+ /* The field below is for single-CPU policies only. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+ unsigned long saved_idle_calls;
+#endif
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sugov_cpu, sugov_cpu);
@@ -192,6 +197,19 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct su
sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+static bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long idle_calls = tick_nohz_get_idle_calls();
+ bool ret = idle_calls == sg_cpu->saved_idle_calls;
+
+ sg_cpu->saved_idle_calls = idle_calls;
+ return ret;
+}
+#else
+static inline bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; }
+#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
+
static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -200,6 +218,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
unsigned long util, max;
unsigned int next_f;
+ bool busy;
sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
sg_cpu->last_update = time;
@@ -207,12 +226,20 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
return;
+ busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
+
if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL) {
next_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
} else {
sugov_get_util(&util, &max);
sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, &util, &max);
next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
+ /*
+ * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
+ * recently, as the reduction is likely to be premature then.
+ */
+ if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq)
+ next_f = sg_policy->next_freq;
}
sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
}
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/tick.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/tick.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ extern void tick_nohz_idle_enter(void);
extern void tick_nohz_idle_exit(void);
extern void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void);
extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void);
+extern unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls(void);
extern u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
extern u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -993,6 +993,18 @@ ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void)
return ts->sleep_length;
}
+/**
+ * tick_nohz_get_idle_calls - return the current idle calls counter value
+ *
+ * Called from the schedutil frequency scaling governor in scheduler context.
+ */
+unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls(void)
+{
+ struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
+
+ return ts->idle_calls;
+}
+
static void tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(struct tick_sched *ts)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Fix and optimization "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-19 14:50 +0100
[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in sugov_start() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-19 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in sugov_start() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Fix per-CPU structure initialization in sugov_start() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 13:50 +0100
[RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-19 14:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-19 22:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-19 22:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-20 12:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 13:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 05:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 09:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-20 13:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-23 01:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-23 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-25 04:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-27 09:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 14:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 14:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-20 12:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 13:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-20 14:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-20 14:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-20 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 14:20 +0100
[RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 23:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 07:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-03-21 13:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 10:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 13:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 14:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-21 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-21 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-21 18:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 16:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 20:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-21 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-21 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid decreasing frequency of busy CPUs Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-03-21 13:00 +0100
[RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-22 00:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-22 10:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-22 11:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-03-23 02:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-23 20:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-23 22:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-03-24 02:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-24 20:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-25 02:20 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-03-25 02:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-03-27 09:20 +0200
csiph-web