Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1598190

Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention

From Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention
Date 2017-03-11 01:00 +0100
Message-ID <tjCBY-2J3-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tixO1-76a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiKLg-7L9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiVnj-6qV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjhxw-4PH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjCsi-2Fo-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

11.03.2017 02:47, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>>
>>>> It doesn't need to be a matter of this particular
>>>> patch set, i.e. this proposal should not trigger a
>>>> v7 resend of all 21 patches. :) But it would be useful
>>>> for the future development of dosemu2.
>>> Would dosemu2 use 32-bit processes in order to keep segmentation? If it
>>> could use 64-bit processes, emulation is not used in this case and the
>>> SIGSEGV is delivered to user space.
>> It does use the mix: 64bit process but some segments
>> are 32bit for DOS code.
> Do you mean that dosemu2 will start as a 64-bit process and will jump to
> 32-bit code segments?
Yes, so the offending insns are executed only in 32bit
and 16bit segments, even if the process itself is 64bit.
I guess you handle 16bit segments same as 32bit ones.

>   My emulation code should work in this case as it
> will use segmentation in 32-bit code descriptors. Is there anything else
> needed?
If I understand you correctly, you are saying that SLDT
executed in 64bit code segment, will inevitably segfault
to userspace. If this is the case and it makes your code
simpler, then its perfectly fine with me as dosemu does
not do this and the 64bit DOS progs are not anticipated.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 09/21] x86/insn-eval: Add functions to get default operand and address sizes Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 03/21] x86/mpx: Do not use R/EBP as base in the SIB byte with Mod = 0 Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 08/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor base address Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 15/21] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 15/21] x86/mm: Relocate page fault error codes to traps.h Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-08 17:10 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 11/21] insn/eval: Incorporate segment base in address computation Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 16/21] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 21/21] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 21/21] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode  Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-08 17:30 +0100
      Re: [v6 PATCH 21/21] selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode  Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-11 00:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 01/21] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:40 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 20/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 13/21] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 17/21] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 05/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get register offsets Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 12/21] x86/insn: Support both signed 32-bit and 64-bit effective addresses Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 07/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 18/21] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 14/21] x86/insn-eval: Add wrapper function for 16-bit and 32-bit address encodings Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 01:50 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 06/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 02:00 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 02/21] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB index if index points to R/ESP Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 02:00 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 19/21] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 02:00 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 19/21] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults  caused by UMIP Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-08 17:00 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 10/21] x86/insn-eval: Do not use R/EBP as base if mod in ModRM is zero Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 02:10 +0100
  [v6 PATCH 04/21] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-kernel Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-08 04:50 +0100
  Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-08 15:30 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-08 18:00 +0100
      Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-09 02:20 +0100
        Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-09 23:10 +0100
        Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-03-10 03:50 +0100
          Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-10 22:00 +0100
            Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-10 22:10 +0100
              Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-10 22:40 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-08 18:20 +0100
      Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-09 02:20 +0100
        Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-09 23:20 +0100
          Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-10 03:50 +0100
            Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-10 12:40 +0100
              Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-10 15:20 +0100
                Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-11 02:30 +0100
              Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-11 01:10 +0100
            Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-11 01:00 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-08 23:30 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-08 23:50 +0100
    Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-09 02:50 +0100
      Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-10 02:30 +0100
        Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-11 00:50 +0100
          Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-03-11 01:00 +0100
            Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-11 01:20 +0100
  Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-08 17:20 +0100

csiph-web