Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1594957
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags |
| Date | 2017-03-08 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tiFLz-4fF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tiilZ-4E4-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tipQu-1uF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiCE1-1ZF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/08/2017 06:25 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Anshuman, > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 03/07/2017 12:06 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> With the discussion[1], I found it seems there are every PageFlags >>> functions return bool at this moment so we don't need double >>> negation any more. >>> Although it's not a problem to keep it, it makes future users >>> confused to use dobule negation for them, too. >>> >>> Remove such possibility. >> >> A quick search of '!!Page' in the source tree does not show any other >> place having this double negation. So I guess this is all which need >> to be fixed. > > Yeb. That's the why my patch includes only khugepagd part but my > concern is PageFlags returns int type not boolean so user might > be confused easily and tempted to use dobule negation. > > Other side is they who create new custom PageXXX(e.g., PageMovable) > should keep it in mind that they should return 0 or 1 although > fucntion prototype's return value is int type. > It shouldn't be > documented nowhere. Was this double negation intentional? :P > Although we can add a little description > somewhere in page-flags.h, I believe changing to boolean is more > clear/not-error-prone so Chen's work is enough worth, I think. Agree, unless some arches benefit from the int by performance for some reason (no idea if it's possible). Anyway, to your original patch: Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-07 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-07 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-08 06:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-03-08 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-03-08 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-09 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2017-03-07 18:50 +0100
csiph-web