Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1594957

Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags

From Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags
Date 2017-03-08 10:10 +0100
Message-ID <tiFLz-4fF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tiilZ-4E4-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tipQu-1uF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tiCE1-1ZF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/08/2017 06:25 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 03/07/2017 12:06 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> With the discussion[1], I found it seems there are every PageFlags
>>> functions return bool at this moment so we don't need double
>>> negation any more.
>>> Although it's not a problem to keep it, it makes future users
>>> confused to use dobule negation for them, too.
>>>
>>> Remove such possibility.
>>
>> A quick search of '!!Page' in the source tree does not show any other
>> place having this double negation. So I guess this is all which need
>> to be fixed.
> 
> Yeb. That's the why my patch includes only khugepagd part but my
> concern is PageFlags returns int type not boolean so user might
> be confused easily and tempted to use dobule negation.
> 
> Other side is they who create new custom PageXXX(e.g., PageMovable)
> should keep it in mind that they should return 0 or 1 although
> fucntion prototype's return value is int type.

> It shouldn't be
> documented nowhere.

Was this double negation intentional? :P

> Although we can add a little description
> somewhere in page-flags.h, I believe changing to boolean is more
> clear/not-error-prone so Chen's work is enough worth, I think.

Agree, unless some arches benefit from the int by performance
for some reason (no idea if it's possible).

Anyway, to your original patch:

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-07 09:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-07 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-08 06:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-03-08 10:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-03-08 11:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-09 07:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2017-03-07 18:50 +0100

csiph-web