Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1590104

Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes

From Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes
Date 2017-03-01 09:50 +0100
Message-ID <tg87p-tP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <tfL18-1He-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfQNc-5z5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfRJf-6ds-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfSvD-6NI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tg5Md-7eV-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 28-02-17, 09:52, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > This comes from the early design of the generic PM domain, thus I
>> > assume we have some HW with such complex PM topology. However, I don't
>> > know if it is actually being used.
>> >
>> > Moreover, the corresponding DT bindings for "power-domains" parents,
>> > can easily be extended to cover more than one parent. See more in
>> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>>
>> I could easily see device having 2 power domains. For example a cpu
>> may have separate domains for RAM/caches and logic.
>
> An important thing here is that PM domain doesn't support such devices. i.e. a
> device isn't allowed to have multiple PM domains today. So a way to support such
> devices can be to create a virtual PM domain, that has two parents and device as
> its child.

As clock domains (and their support code) are fairly orthogonal to power
areas, currently our power area controller driver just forwards the
clock handling
to the clock driver (cfr. rcar-sysc).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0100
  [PATCH V3 5/7] PM / domain: Register for PM QOS performance notifier Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0100
  [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states"  binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 02:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states"  binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-28 06:40 +0100
  [PATCH V3 7/7] PM / OPP: Add support to parse domain-performance-state Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:40 +0100
  [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 01:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-28 09:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 15:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2017-02-28 16:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 17:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-28 20:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-01 07:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-03-01 09:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-01 10:30 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-01 09:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-02 00:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-02 04:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state"  binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-01 08:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2017-03-10 21:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100

csiph-web