Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1590024
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes |
| Date | 2017-03-01 07:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tg5Md-7eV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <tfE9j-53z-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfL18-1He-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfQNc-5z5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfRJf-6ds-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfSvD-6NI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 28-02-17, 09:52, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > > This comes from the early design of the generic PM domain, thus I > > assume we have some HW with such complex PM topology. However, I don't > > know if it is actually being used. > > > > Moreover, the corresponding DT bindings for "power-domains" parents, > > can easily be extended to cover more than one parent. See more in > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt > > I could easily see device having 2 power domains. For example a cpu > may have separate domains for RAM/caches and logic. An important thing here is that PM domain doesn't support such devices. i.e. a device isn't allowed to have multiple PM domains today. So a way to support such devices can be to create a virtual PM domain, that has two parents and device as its child. -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0100
[PATCH V3 5/7] PM / domain: Register for PM QOS performance notifier Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0100
[PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 02:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-28 06:40 +0100
[PATCH V3 7/7] PM / OPP: Add support to parse domain-performance-state Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 10:40 +0100
[PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-24 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-02-28 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2017-02-28 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-02-28 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-28 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-01 07:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-03-01 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-01 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-01 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-02 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-02 04:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-01 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2017-03-10 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100
csiph-web