Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1599193
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states |
| Date | 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tkvI6-7IV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tekcF-6wz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjzup-FR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10-03-17, 12:38, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Why limit it to just voltage levels. > > As I suggested earlier, I think this should use OPPs. Remember that a > PM domain is not limited to a hardware power domain, but is just a > grouping mechanism for devices that share some PM properties. As > mentioned by Geert, this can also be a clock domain, where frequencies > would make sense as well. One can imagine using this type of PM domain > to manage an interconnect/bus which has scalable voltage/frequencies as > well. Okay, I tried to do that change today and am blocked a bit right now. The OPP core and all of its APIs/interfaces have dependency on the "struct device" for their working. It gets the of_node from it, stores the device pointer to manage cases where multiple devices share OPP table, uses it to get clk and regulators. But the "genpd" structure doesn't have a 'struct device' associated with it. How should I make both of them work together? I tried to create separate helpers that don't accept 'dev', but that is also not good. Just too much redundant code everywhere. Would creating a 'dev' structure within 'generic_pm_domain' be acceptable? Or should we ask the domain-drivers to call something like of_genpd_parse_idle_states(), with a fake 'dev' structure which has its of_node initialized? Or maybe move that hack within the OPP-core API, which can create a dev structure at runtime for the genpd passed to it and get the OPP table out? -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2017-03-10 21:40 +0100 Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100
csiph-web