Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1580709
| From | Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline |
| Date | 2017-02-14 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <taPf4-4KR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tauaC-7Oj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tauaD-7Oj-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <taOCl-4hz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02/14/2017 04:54 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 13/02/2017 20:05, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: >> To avoid this problem, in the activation of a constrained deadline >> task after the deadline but before the next period, throttle the >> task and set the replenishing timer to the begin of the next period, >> unless it is boosted. > > my only comment is that, by throttling on (dl < wakeuptime < period), we > force the app to sync its activation time with the kernel, and the cbs > doesn't self-sync anymore with the app own periodicity, which is what > normally happens with dl=period. With dl=period, we loose the cbs > self-sync and we force the app to sync with the kernel periodic timer > only if we use explicitly yield(), but now this becomes also implicit > just if we set dl<period. I see your point. However, that will happen only if, for some external fact or imprecision, the task wakes up with a minimum inter-arrival time smaller than the dl_period. In such case, IMHO the user must be aware of the miss behavior or imprecision of the task/method which activates the task and set an appropriate/safer smaller dl_period. Furthermore, (correct me if I am wrong...) CBS will self-sync implicit deadline tasks which did not consume all its previous runtime. Because, if the runtime was consumed, the wake-up will fall in the same case I am making constrained tasks to fall - the task will be throttled until the next replenishment, after the next period. The idea is to simulate sched_yield(). By suspending itself further than the deadline, the task either has timing problems, or it wants to suspend itself until the next activation, like calling sched_yeild(), but allowing itself to be sporadic (to be activated after the minimum inter-arrival time). > >> attr.sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE; >> attr.sched_runtime = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ >> attr.sched_deadline = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ >> attr.sched_period = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 s */ > ... >> On my box, this reproducer uses almost 50% of the CPU time, which is >> obviously wrong for a task with 2/2000 reservation. > > just a note here: in this example of runtime=deadline=2ms, shall we rely > on a utilization-based test, then we should assume the task is taking 100%. > More precise tests for EDF with deadline<period would properly count the > 1998ms/2000ms free space, instead. Yeah, it is taking 100% for runtime/deadline. But the admission is runtime/period, so it will pass. The idea of runtime=deadline is to avoid the task being throttled. If the task is throttle we would not be able to demonstrate this bug. Anyway, we can set runtime = (0.95 * deadline), it will also reproduce the problem, as long as the task is put to sleep before being throttled. Thanks! -- Daniel
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V2 0/2] sched/deadline: Fixes for constrained deadline tasks Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
[PATCH V2 2/2] sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it> - 2017-02-14 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-14 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-14 20:40 +0100
[PATCH V2 1/2] sched/deadline: Replenishment timer should fire in the next period Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
[PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-14 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> - 2017-02-14 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-15 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> - 2017-02-15 08:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-02-15 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-15 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> - 2017-02-15 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-02-15 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> - 2017-02-15 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-02-15 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-15 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> - 2017-02-15 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-15 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-02-15 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it> - 2017-02-16 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-16 17:50 +0100
csiph-web