Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1677809

RE: [PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup

From David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup
Date 2017-06-29 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <tXICf-eR-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tX3pn-4kt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tX3pn-4kt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXgPD-4wG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXmBI-86L-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


From: Al Cooper
> Sent: 28 June 2017 15:56
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:47 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>       temp = bdc_readl(bdc->regs, BDC_BDCSC);
> >>       if ((temp & BDC_P64) &&
> >>                       !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> >> -             dev_dbg(bdc->dev, "Using 64-bit address\n");
> >> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Using 64-bit address\n");
> >>       } else {
> >> -             ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> >> +             ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> >
> > That just wrong...
> > Or was wrong before.
> 
> Why is this wrong?

It isn't obvious that &pdev->dev is bdc->dev and hence dev.

	David

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 20:30 +0200
  RE: [PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2017-06-28 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup Al Cooper <al.cooper@broadcom.com> - 2017-06-28 17:00 +0200
      RE: [PATCH 4/8] usb: bdc: Small code cleanup David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2017-06-29 16:30 +0200

csiph-web