Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1664743

Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

From Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"
Date 2017-06-13 12:50 +0200
Message-ID <tRRyy-6SG-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tRPQ5-5MF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRRoS-6Pq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tRRyx-6SG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:40 +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 13/06/17 11:36, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > > 
> > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
> > Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
> > good thing to change possibly API dependent output
> > in seq_ calls?
> Considering it's in -next and has not landed in upstream I supposed it
> was better to fix it now before it landed in Linus' repo.

Good call, thanks.

> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
> > 
> > []
> > > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > >  	struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
> > >  
> > >  	seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
> > > -	seq_printf(s, "  Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > > +	seq_printf(s, "  Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > >  	seq_printf(s, "  Cores [AE: %u  SE: %u]\n",
> > >  		   ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
> > >  	seq_printf(s, "  Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision" Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-06-13 11:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake  "Revsion" -> "Revision" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-13 12:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake  "Revsion" -> "Revision" Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-06-13 12:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake  "Revsion" -> "Revision" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-13 12:50 +0200

csiph-web