Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1664731
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision" |
| Date | 2017-06-13 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tRRoS-6Pq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tRPQ5-5MF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message Hey Colin. Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a good thing to change possibly API dependent output in seq_ calls? > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c [] > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) > struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private; > > seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx); > - seq_printf(s, " Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id); > + seq_printf(s, " Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id); > seq_printf(s, " Cores [AE: %u SE: %u]\n", > ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores); > seq_printf(s, " Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision" Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-06-13 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-13 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision" Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2017-06-13 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-06-13 12:50 +0200
csiph-web