Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1654478
| From | Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations |
| Date | 2017-05-31 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNfBv-7MH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tLFA5-QN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLFA6-QN-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tMnhL-4ZZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN597-16T-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 5/31/2017 11:48 AM, Chen, Xiaoguang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kraxel@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 3:20 PM
>> To: Chen, Xiaoguang <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com>;
>> alex.williamson@redhat.com; chris@chris-wilson.co.uk; intel-
>> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> zhenyuw@linux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>; intel-gvt-
>> dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>; Tian, Kevin
>> <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations
>>
>>> +struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info {
>>> + __u32 argsz;
>>> + __u32 flags;
>>> + struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
>>> + __s32 fd;
>>> + __u32 pad;
>>> +};
>>
>> Hmm, now you have argsz and flags twice in vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info ...
>>
>> I think we should have something like this:
>>
>> struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info {
>> __u64 start;
>> __u64 drm_format_mod;
>> __u32 drm_format;
>> __u32 width;
>> __u32 height;
>> __u32 stride;
>> __u32 size;
>> __u32 x_pos;
>> __u32 y_pos;
>> __u32 padding;
>> };
>>
>> struct vfio_vgpu_query_plane {
>> __u32 argsz;
>> __u32 flags;
>> struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
>> __u32 plane_id;
>> __u32 padding;
>> };
>>
>> struct vfio_vgpu_create_dmabuf {
>> __u32 argsz;
>> __u32 flags;
>> struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
>> __u32 plane_id;
>> __s32 fd;
>> };
> Good suggestion will apply in the next version.
> Thanks for review :)
>
Can you define what are the expected values of 'flags' would be?
Thanks,
Kirti
> Chenxg.
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
[PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-31 07:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:50 +0200
[PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-31 14:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-01 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> - 2017-06-01 11:20 +0200
[PATCH v6 1/6] drm/i915/gvt: Extend the GVT-g architecture to support vfio device region Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
[PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-29 09:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-05-31 19:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-01 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-01 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-02 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-05 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-06 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-30 12:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-31 11:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 11:10 +0200
csiph-web