Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1654028
| From | "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g |
| Date | 2017-05-31 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tN7NE-2Od-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tLFA5-QN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tMMzw-677-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN1yx-76t-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN7DY-2u7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Gerd, I found this problem once I sent the patches :( I checked the uapi definitions and found it is usually called pad to do the aligning. So I changed the 'resv' to 'pad' in the patch but forgot to update it in the last patch and did not test after the "small" change. Next time I will test even when the change is very small. I will change this in the next version. Sorry for the mistake. >-----Original Message----- >From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kraxel@redhat.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 4:59 PM >To: Chen, Xiaoguang <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com>; >alex.williamson@redhat.com; chris@chris-wilson.co.uk; intel- >gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >zhenyuw@linux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>; intel-gvt- >dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>; Tian, Kevin ><kevin.tian@intel.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g > >On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 02:29 +0000, Chen, Xiaoguang wrote: >> Hi Gerd, >> >> It is based on 4.12.0-rc1 > >Applies, good. >But then fails to build: > >error: ‘struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info’ has no member named ‘resv’ > >gvt/kvmgt.c:611:11: note: in expansion of macro ‘offsetofend’ > minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info, resv); > >/me wonders how this was tested ... > >cheers, > Gerd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
[PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-31 07:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:50 +0200
[PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-31 14:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-01 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dmabuf support for GVT-g Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> - 2017-06-01 11:20 +0200
[PATCH v6 1/6] drm/i915/gvt: Extend the GVT-g architecture to support vfio device region Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
[PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-27 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-29 09:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-05-31 19:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-06-01 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-01 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-02 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-06-05 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-06-06 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-30 12:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-31 11:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 11:10 +0200
csiph-web