Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1654148
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking |
| Date | 2017-05-31 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNa8O-48w-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tKAsN-ma-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKAsO-ma-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN8qm-31c-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN9cJ-3w7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN9mq-3zx-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:41:11AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 31/05/17 12:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Again, it seems I have this CPPC/HWP crud firmly stuck in my brain. > > Because I was thinking: > > > > min_freq = dl_util > > avg_freq = dl_avg + rt_avg + cfs_util > > > > > > But given we don't actually have that split... meh. > > > > Right, interesting. So, I guess the question is: should we have it? :) I think cpufreq should certainly look at moving into that direction, but that's up to Rafael of course..
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 12:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-05-31 12:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 13:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-05-31 13:30 +0200
csiph-web