Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1654137
| From | Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking |
| Date | 2017-05-31 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tN9Z7-45a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tKAsN-ma-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKAsO-ma-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN8qm-31c-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 31 May 2017 at 11:40, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> schedutil governor relies on cfs_rq's util_avg to choose the OPP when cfs >> tasks are running. When the CPU is overloaded by cfs and rt tasks, cfs tasks >> are preempted by rt tasks and in this case util_avg reflects the remaining >> capacity that is used by cfs tasks but not what cfs tasks want to use. In such >> case, schedutil can select a lower OPP when cfs task runs whereas the CPU is >> overloaded. In order to have a more accurate view of the utilization of the >> CPU, we track the utilization that is used by RT tasks. >> DL tasks are not taken into account as they have their own utilization >> tracking mecanism. > > Well, the DL tracking is fairly pessimistic; it assumes all DL tasks > will consume their total budget, which will rarely, if ever, happen. > > So I suspect it might well be worth it to also track DL activity for the > purpose of compensating CFS. > > In fact, I don't think you particularly care about RT here, as anything > !CFS that preempts it, including those interrupts you mentioned. Which > gets us back to what rt_avg is. > >> We don't use rt_avg which doesn't have the same dynamic as PELT and which >> can include IRQ time that are also accounted in cfs task utilization > > Well, if rt_avg includes IRQ time, then that IRQ time is not part of > the task clock. ah yes you're right. I haven't noticed irq time was removed from the clock used for accounting PELT > >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> >> --- >> >> If the changes are reasonnable, it might worth moving the PELT function in a >> dedicated pelt.c file and the ugly >> extern int update_rt_rq_load_avg(u64 now, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int running); >> in a pelt.h header >> >> >> kernel/sched/fair.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> kernel/sched/rt.c | 9 +++++++++ >> kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +++ >> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > Also, and I didn't check this, it is important that the windows are > aligned if you want to sum the values. yes. good point
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 12:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-05-31 12:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 13:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-05-31 13:30 +0200
csiph-web