Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1654137

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking

From Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking
Date 2017-05-31 13:30 +0200
Message-ID <tN9Z7-45a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tKAsN-ma-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKAsO-ma-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN8qm-31c-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 31 May 2017 at 11:40, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> schedutil governor relies on cfs_rq's util_avg to choose the OPP when cfs
>> tasks are running. When the CPU is overloaded by cfs and rt tasks, cfs tasks
>> are preempted by rt tasks and in this case util_avg reflects the remaining
>> capacity that is used by cfs tasks but not what cfs tasks want to use. In such
>> case, schedutil can select a lower OPP when cfs task runs whereas the CPU is
>> overloaded. In order to have a more accurate view of the utilization of the
>> CPU, we track the utilization that is used by RT tasks.
>> DL tasks are not taken into account as they have their own utilization
>> tracking mecanism.
>
> Well, the DL tracking is fairly pessimistic; it assumes all DL tasks
> will consume their total budget, which will rarely, if ever, happen.
>
> So I suspect it might well be worth it to also track DL activity for the
> purpose of compensating CFS.
>
> In fact, I don't think you particularly care about RT here, as anything
> !CFS that preempts it, including those interrupts you mentioned. Which
> gets us back to what rt_avg is.
>
>> We don't use rt_avg which doesn't have the same dynamic as PELT and which
>> can include IRQ time that are also accounted in cfs task utilization
>
> Well, if rt_avg includes IRQ time, then that IRQ time is not part of
> the task clock.

ah yes you're right.
I haven't noticed irq time was removed from the clock used for accounting PELT

>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>
>> If the changes are reasonnable, it might worth moving the PELT function in a
>> dedicated pelt.c file and the ugly
>> extern int update_rt_rq_load_avg(u64 now, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int running);
>> in a pelt.h header
>>
>>
>>  kernel/sched/fair.c  | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  kernel/sched/rt.c    |  9 +++++++++
>>  kernel/sched/sched.h |  3 +++
>>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> Also, and I didn't check this, it is important that the windows are
> aligned if you want to sum the values.

yes. good point

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 11:50 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 12:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-05-31 12:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 13:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-05-31 13:30 +0200

csiph-web