Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1654110
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking |
| Date | 2017-05-31 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tN9cJ-3w7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tKAsN-ma-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKAsO-ma-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN8qm-31c-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:40:47AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > schedutil governor relies on cfs_rq's util_avg to choose the OPP when cfs > > tasks are running. When the CPU is overloaded by cfs and rt tasks, cfs tasks > > are preempted by rt tasks and in this case util_avg reflects the remaining > > capacity that is used by cfs tasks but not what cfs tasks want to use. In such > > case, schedutil can select a lower OPP when cfs task runs whereas the CPU is > > overloaded. In order to have a more accurate view of the utilization of the > > CPU, we track the utilization that is used by RT tasks. > > DL tasks are not taken into account as they have their own utilization > > tracking mecanism. > > Well, the DL tracking is fairly pessimistic; it assumes all DL tasks > will consume their total budget, which will rarely, if ever, happen. > > So I suspect it might well be worth it to also track DL activity for the > purpose of compensating CFS. Again, it seems I have this CPPC/HWP crud firmly stuck in my brain. Because I was thinking: min_freq = dl_util avg_freq = dl_avg + rt_avg + cfs_util But given we don't actually have that split... meh. > In fact, I don't think you particularly care about RT here, as anything > !CFS that preempts it, including those interrupts you mentioned. Which > gets us back to what rt_avg is. > > > We don't use rt_avg which doesn't have the same dynamic as PELT and which > > can include IRQ time that are also accounted in cfs task utilization > > Well, if rt_avg includes IRQ time, then that IRQ time is not part of > the task clock.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 12:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-05-31 12:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 13:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: add utilization tracking Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-05-31 13:30 +0200
csiph-web