Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core

From	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core
Date	2017-05-24 06:10 +0200
Message-ID	<tKvMt-5sv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tA5Tk-3rD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKux4-4qI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKvCN-59f-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Viresh,

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:23:52AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-05-17, 19:41, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:57:07PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Hi Guys,
> > > 
> > > The cpu_cooling driver is designed to use CPU frequency scaling to avoid
> > > high thermal states for a platform. But it wasn't glued really well with
> > > cpufreq core. For example clipped-cpus is copied from the policy
> > > structure and its much better to use the policy->cpus (or related_cpus)
> > > fields directly as they may have got updated. Not that things were
> > > broken before this series, but they can be optimized a bit more.
> > > 
> > > This series tries to improve interactions between cpufreq core and
> > > cpu_cooling driver and does some fixes/cleanups to the cpu_cooling
> > > driver.
> > > 
> > > I have tested it on ARM 32 (exynos) and 64 bit (hikey) boards (haven't
> > > tested the power specific bits).
> > > 
> > > Lukasz from ARM has been very generous in testing and finding out few
> > > bugs in the earlier versions and getting those fixed.  He has
> > > successfully tested the new version on his ARM big LITTLE Juno board.
> > > 
> > > Pushed here as well:
> > > 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git thermal/cooling
> > > 
> > > V3->V4:
> > 
> > 
> > Took this version into my -linus branch for the next merge window.
> > Including the patch to remove the checkpatch warning. But please send
> > an extra patch to fix the style pointed on patch 8.
> 
> Thanks Eduardo.
> 
> But I am not sure what's left there to be fixed :(
> 
> There were two warnings with patch 8, s/kmalloc/kmalloc_array and line
> over 80 columns and both were fixed by the patch I sent separately.

You are right, you are done here. This was probably a bug in my script
showing old checkpatch results on patch 8, somehow.

Sorry for the noise.

> 
> -- 
> viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with  cpufreq core Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 04:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with  cpufreq core Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-05-24 06:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with  cpufreq core Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 06:10 +0200

csiph-web