Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1649848
| From | "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Allow ACPI C1 FFH MWAIT use on AMD systems |
| Date | 2017-05-24 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKJ34-5LE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tJYnx-80c-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKh6N-38u-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@ucw.cz] > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 8:25 AM > To: Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; rjw@rjwysocki.net; len.brown@intel.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Allow ACPI C1 FFH MWAIT use on > AMD systems > > On Wed 2017-05-17 09:20:19, Yazen Ghannam wrote: > > From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> > > > > AMD systems support the Monitor/Mwait instructions and these can be > > used for ACPI C1 in the same way as on Intel systems, with appropriate > > BIOS support. > > > > Allow ffh_cstate_init() to succeed on AMD systems and make the Cstate > > description vendor-agnostic. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c > > b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c index 8a908ae..4c5dd5d 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c > > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static long > acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu(void *_cx) > > cx->type); > > } > > snprintf(cx->desc, > > - ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN, "ACPI FFH INTEL MWAIT 0x%x", > > + ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN, "ACPI FFH X86 MWAIT 0x%x", > > cx->address); > > out: > > return retval; > > Are you sure no userspace depends on word "INTEL" there? > So far I've only seen this description printed by cpupower, and it's just for information. > Does it make sense to include "X86" there? I think so, since MWAIT is available on systems from both Intel and AMD. Also, this FFH implementation can be shared by both vendors. Though, as I said above, this description seems to be purely informational, so it's probably not significant either way. I can remove this if preferred. Thanks, Yazen
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Allow ACPI C1 FFH MWAIT use on AMD systems Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-05-23 14:30 +0200 RE: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Allow ACPI C1 FFH MWAIT use on AMD systems "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> - 2017-05-24 20:20 +0200
csiph-web