Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1649847

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers control in cgroup v2

From Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers control in cgroup v2
Date 2017-05-24 20:20 +0200
Message-ID <tKJ33-5LE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <tIXaa-7Bx-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIXDb-823-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKIqm-5iH-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKIA3-5m6-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKIJI-5pb-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Red Hat

Show all headers | View raw


On 05/24/2017 01:56 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:49:46PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> What I am saying is as follows:
>>     / A
>> P - B
>>    \ C
>>
>> # echo +memory > P/cgroups.subtree_control
>> # echo -memory > P/A/cgroup.controllers
>> # echo "#memory" > P/B/cgroup.controllers
>>
>> The parent grants the memory controller to its children - A, B and C.
>> Child A has the memory controller explicitly disabled. Child B has the
>> memory controller in pass-through mode, while child C has the memory
>> controller enabled by default. "echo +memory > cgroup.controllers" is
>> not allowed. There are 2 possible choices with regard to the '-' or '#'
>> prefixes. We can allow them before the grant from the parent or only
>> after that. In the former case, the state remains dormant until after
>> the grant from the parent.
> Ah, I see, you want cgroup.controllers to be able to mask available
> controllers by the parent.  Can you expand your example with further
> nesting and how #memory on cgroup.controllers would affect the nested
> descendant?
>
> Thanks.
>
I would allow enabling the controller in subtree_control if granted from
the parent and not explicitly disabled. IOW, both B and C can "echo
+memory" to their subtree_control to grant memory controller to their
children, but not A. A has to re-enable memory controller or set it to
pass-through mode before it can enable it in subtree_control. I need to
clarify that "echo +memory > cgroup.controllers" is allowed to re-enable
it, but not without the granting from its parent.

Cheers,
Longman

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers control in cgroup v2 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-05-15 15:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers  control in cgroup v2 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-19 23:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers  control in cgroup v2 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-05-19 23:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers  control in cgroup v2 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-24 19:40 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers  control in cgroup v2 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-05-24 19:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers  control in cgroup v2 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-24 20:00 +0200
            Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] cgroup: Allow fine-grained controllers  control in cgroup v2 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-05-24 20:20 +0200

csiph-web