Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1647430

RE: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter

Show all headers | View raw

> 
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:55:47PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:06:21AM -0700, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> >> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> >> > > index
> >> > > 580b60f..e8b2326 100644
> >> > > --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> >> > > +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> >> > > @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ u64 x86_perf_event_update(struct
> perf_event
> >> > *event)
> >> > >   delta = (new_raw_count << shift) - (prev_raw_count << shift);
> >> > >   delta >>= shift;
> >> > >
> >> > > + /* Correct the count number if applying ref_cycles replacement
> >> > > + */ if (!is_sampling_event(event) &&
> >> > > +     (hwc->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_REF_CYCLES_REP))
> >> > > +         delta *= x86_pmu.ref_cycles_factor;
> >> >
> >> > That condition seems wrong, why only correct for !sampling events?
> >> >
> >>
> >> For sampling, it's either fixed freq mode or fixed period mode.
> >>  - In the fixed freq mode, we should do nothing, because the adaptive
> >>    frequency algorithm will handle it.
> >>  - In the fixed period mode, we have already adjusted the period in
> >>     ref_cycles_rep().
> >> Therefore, we should only handle !sampling events here.
> >
> > How so? For sampling events the actual event count should also be
> > accurate.
> 
> Yes, it must be. Because you can reconstruct the total number of occurrences
> of the event by adding all the periods recorded in each sample. So the period
> in each sample must reflect user event and not kernel event.

Peter and Stephane, you are right.
After adjusting the period, I can only make sure the number of samples for
the bus_cycles event is the same as that for ref cycles event.
I still need to adjust the number of occurrences of the event accordingly,
to make it accurate.
I will change it in next version.

Thanks,
Kan

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter kan.liang@intel.com - 2017-05-19 20:00 +0200
  [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref cycles on x86 kan.liang@intel.com - 2017-05-19 20:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref  cycles on x86 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 14:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref  cycles on x86 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 14:10 +0200
      RE: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to  ref cycles on x86 "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> - 2017-05-22 19:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref  cycles on x86 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 21:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref  cycles on x86 Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-05-22 20:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref  cycles on x86 Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-22 22:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 10:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-05-22 20:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 11:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 14:30 +0200
      RE: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> - 2017-05-22 19:00 +0200
    RE: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> - 2017-05-22 19:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 21:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-05-22 21:30 +0200
          RE: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> - 2017-05-23 00:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-23 08:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2017-05-23 08:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-24 17:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP  counter Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> - 2017-05-24 18:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-24 19:00 +0200

csiph-web