Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1645224

Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than Intel RSTe

From Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than Intel RSTe
Date 2017-05-19 08:40 +0200
Message-ID <tIJJT-6HC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tGa3T-7oh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIEKd-35n-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:13:55PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> a) Leave the Dell quirk in place until someone from Dell or Samsung
> figures out what's actually going on.  Add a blanket quirk turning off
> the deepest sleep state on all Intel devices [1] at least until
> someone from Intel figures out what's going on -- Hi, Keith!  Deal
> with any other problems as they're reported.

I think we should just blacklist the 60p entirely.  It also seems to
corrupt data 100% reliable when used with XFS.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-12 06:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-05-12 16:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-12 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-05-12 16:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-13 02:00 +0200
          RE: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-05-15 18:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-13 14:30 +0200
    RE: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-05-15 18:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-19 03:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-19 03:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-19 03:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> - 2017-05-19 03:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive  than Intel RSTe Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-05-19 08:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive         than Intel RSTe Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-05-19 16:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive  than Intel RSTe Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> - 2017-05-19 16:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive than  Intel RSTe Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-19 20:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] nvme: Change our APST table to be no more aggressive  than Intel RSTe Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> - 2017-05-19 23:40 +0200

csiph-web