Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1637498
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional |
| Date | 2017-05-08 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tESC6-5Ad-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tECnF-34t-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <tECnF-34t-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEDto-46D-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEG7T-5FW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tELhf-SA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 05/08/2017 01:25 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 07:52:14PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 05/07/2017 11:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote: >>>> On 05/07/2017 11:12 AM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote: >>>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> >>>>> >>>>> Add a new Kconfig option to enable/disable the extra warnings >>>>> from the vblank evade code. For now we'll keep the warning >>>>> about an actually missed vblank always enabled as that can have >>>>> an actual user visible impact. But if we miss the deadline >>>>> othrwise there's no real need to bother the user with that. >>>>> We'll want these warnings enabled during development however >>>>> so that we can catch regressions. >>>>> >>>>> Based on the reports it looks like this is still very easy >>>>> to hit on SKL, so we have more work ahead of us to optimize >>>>> the crtiical section further. >>>> >>>> Shouldn't it just be a debug printk or something instead, so that normal >>>> people don't see it, but the folks that turn on debugging can get the >>>> info they need? Seems silly to add a kconfig option for this. >>> >>> I guess we could keep it as debug for users, but we want to make this >>> a hard failure on our CI machines. Kconfig knob is the easiest to roll >>> out to all machines. >> >> Wouldn't a module parameter be more useful then, as an opt-in >> to catch these violations. >> >> Nobody is going to know wtf to set this kconfig option to. > > They're all hidden behind an overall i915 debugging option which tells you > not to enable it. You won't see this. OK, that does improve things a bit. -- Jens Axboe
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [git pull] drm pull for v4.12 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-06 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-05-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-08 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-05-08 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-08 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-05-08 17:20 +0200
[PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com - 2017-05-08 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make vblank evade warnings optional Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-08 09:30 +0200
Re: [git pull] drm pull for v4.12 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-08 01:00 +0200
csiph-web