Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1632467
| From | AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly |
| Date | 2017-04-28 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tB2qm-8uf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tAquJ-87M-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAZLQ-6S4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Thiago, Thank you for the comment. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:00:04PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hello, > > Am Mittwoch, 26. April 2017, 17:22:09 BRT schrieb AKASHI Takahiro: > > The current kexec_locate_mem_hole(kbuf.top_down == 1) stops searching at > > the first memory region that has enough space for requested size even if > > some of higher regions may also have. > > kexec_locate_mem_hole expects arch_kexec_walk_mem to walk memory from top to > bottom if top_down is true. That is what powerpc's version does. Ah, I haven't noticed that, but x86 doesn't have arch_kexec_walk_mem and how can it work for x86? > Isn't it possible to walk resources from top to bottom? Yes, it will be, but it seems to me that such a behavior is not intuitive and even confusing if it doesn't come with explicit explanation. > > This behavior is not consistent with locate_hole(hole_end == -1) function > > of kexec-tools. > > > > This patch fixes the bug, going though all the memory regions anyway. > > This patch would break powerpc, because at the end of the memory walk kbuf > would have the lowest memory hole. > > If it's not possible to walk resources in reverse order, then this patch needs > to change powerpc to always walk memory from bottom to top. So I would like to hear from x86 guys. Thanks -Takahiro AKASHI > -- > Thiago Jung Bauermann > IBM Linux Technology Center >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2017-04-26 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-28 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2017-04-28 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-04-28 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-04-28 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-28 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kexec: allocate buffer in top-down, if specified, correctly Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-04-28 06:50 +0200
csiph-web