Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1577358

RE: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue elements")

From Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue elements")
Date 2017-02-09 08:40 +0100
Message-ID <t8RuF-3aL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <t87rP-7wp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8gEO-5ar-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8y8F-7Ir-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8Exs-3hZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8F0v-3Hv-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

> From: hch@lst.de [mailto:hch@lst.de]
> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 02:03
> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>; Bart Van Assche
> <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>; hare@suse.com; hare@suse.de; Martin K.
> Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>; hch@lst.de; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; jth@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock
> when scheduling workqueue elements")
> 
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:43:59AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I've changed the subject line, this issue has nothing to do with the
> > issue that Hannes was attempting to fix.
> 
> Nothing really useful in the thread.  Dexuan, can you throw in some
> prints to see which command times out?

My colleagues have sent you the logs in another thread.

Thanks for looking into this!

-- Dexuan

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> - 2017-01-31 17:20 +0100
  RE: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-03 13:30 +0100
    RE: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-07 03:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com> - 2017-02-07 04:00 +0100
        RE: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-07 07:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-02-07 17:20 +0100
            RE: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue  elements Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-08 12:00 +0100
              Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when  scheduling workqueue elements") Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-02-08 18:50 +0100
                Re: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event         lock when scheduling workqueue elements") "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de> - 2017-02-08 19:20 +0100
                RE: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock  when scheduling workqueue elements") Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-09 08:40 +0100
                Re: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event         lock when scheduling workqueue elements") "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de> - 2017-02-09 14:40 +0100

csiph-web