Re: regression for m68k/coldfire

From	Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: regression for m68k/coldfire
Date	2017-02-06 12:50 +0100
Message-ID	<t7PXY-4pP-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <t6Hg6-7zc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6NOy-3bO-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6NYf-3fD-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6XXA-249-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t75ip-75K-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Laurent,

On 04/02/17 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 04/02/2017 à 03:03, Greg Ungerer a écrit :
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> On 04/02/17 01:22, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> Le 03/02/2017 à 16:17, Waldemar Brodkorb a écrit :
>> [snip]
>>>> Btw: Laurent, are you m68k with mmu support are going to be included
>>>> upstream? I always carry an old binary for any m68k with mmu testing.
>>>
>>> I'm working to have the FPU included for now, that will allow to have
>>> the linux-user qemu enabled for 680x0 upstream.
>>>
>>> I have a 68040 MMU implementation that I will send after this step.
>>> I didn't have a look to the ColdFire MMU (is there one?), but as 68040
>>> is not the same as the 68030 one, I don't expect it works with coldfire.
>>
>> There is a ColdFire MMU in some v4 ColdFire parts, for example
>> the 547x, 548x, 5441x and 5445x families. It is not compatible with
>> the older 68020/86030/68040 MMU. It is supported in mainline Linux -
>> at least for the 547x and 548x parts.
>>
>> It would be really nice to have support for ColdFire MMU in QEMU :-)
>
> I can work on this. Do you have a Coldfire distro I can install?

This is the one I use:

   http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/

(toolchains for it at http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/m68k-elf-tools/)

Or if you don't want to compile it there is a ready to
run binary for the m5475evb at:

   http://www.uclinux.org/ports/coldfire/binary.html

Regards
Greg

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

regression for m68k/coldfire Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> - 2017-02-02 21:30 +0100
  Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> - 2017-02-03 01:30 +0100
    Re: regression for m68k/coldfire John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-02-03 01:40 +0100
      Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> - 2017-02-03 09:20 +0100
        Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> - 2017-02-03 16:20 +0100
          Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> - 2017-02-03 16:30 +0100
            Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> - 2017-02-04 03:10 +0100
              Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> - 2017-02-04 11:00 +0100
                Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> - 2017-02-06 12:50 +0100

csiph-web