Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1573145

Re: regression for m68k/coldfire

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,
Laurent Vivier wrote,

> Le 03/02/2017 à 01:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> > On 02/03/2017 01:10 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >> This is a limitation in the FEC support in QEMU.
> >> This works on real ColdFire hardware (which do support the
> >> FEC MIB stats registers from offset 0x200 - so not 5272).
> >> I sent this patch to the qemu dev list a couple of weeks
> >> back which fixes qemu:
> >>
> >>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-01/msg01781.html
> >>
> >> I do not believe it has been picked up by QEMU mainline yet
> >> (I will probably have to resend and push a little to get that done).
> > 
> > QEMU upstream can sometimes take a while before they are merging patches,
> > but usually it helps containing the maintainer of this part of the
> > source tree directly.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, mcf5208 is currently unmaintained [1]:
> > 
> > mcf5208
> > S: Orphan
> > F: hw/m68k/mcf5208.c
> > F: hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
> > F: hw/char/mcf_uart.c
> > F: hw/net/mcf_fec.c
> > 
> > But you can try getting into touch with Laurent Vivier who is the
> > new maintainer of the m68k target. I have CC'ed him.
> > 
> > Adrian
> > 
> >> [1] http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=MAINTAINERS
> > 
> 
> Use scripts/get_maintainer.pl on your patch to find the people.
> 
> This patch is on the network part, so you should cc:
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> (odd fixer:Network devices)
> 
> If you cc me, you add more chances to have a review ;)

I tried the patch on top of 2.8.0 qemu release and it works for me
with Linux Kernel 4.9.
Thanks for the hint and patch!
I hope Greg's patch get included in the next qemu release.

Btw: Laurent, are you m68k with mmu support are going to be included
upstream? I always carry an old binary for any m68k with mmu testing.

best regards
 Waldemar

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

regression for m68k/coldfire Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> - 2017-02-02 21:30 +0100
  Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> - 2017-02-03 01:30 +0100
    Re: regression for m68k/coldfire John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-02-03 01:40 +0100
      Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> - 2017-02-03 09:20 +0100
        Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> - 2017-02-03 16:20 +0100
          Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> - 2017-02-03 16:30 +0100
            Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> - 2017-02-04 03:10 +0100
              Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> - 2017-02-04 11:00 +0100
                Re: regression for m68k/coldfire Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> - 2017-02-06 12:50 +0100

csiph-web