Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1505212

Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag

From Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag
Date 2016-10-20 21:50 +0200
Message-ID <survH-3sZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <srctb-3jq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <srmCe-1kH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <srXs5-1E4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <suisq-68t-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <suiC5-6ej-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:57:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Bin Gao wrote:
> > > @@ -702,6 +702,15 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * For Atom SoCs TSC is the only reliable clocksource.
> > > +	 * Mark TSC reliable so no watchdog on it.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT)
> > > +		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
> > > +
> 
> AFAICT setting TSC_RELIABLE also skips the check_tsc_warp() tests in
> tsc_sync.c.
> 
> This means that if someone does a Goldmont BIOS with 'features', we'll
> never detect the wreckage :-/

Well, we have the same issue on other platforms/models which set the
reliable flag.

So one sanity check we can do is to read the IA32_TSC_ADJUST MSR on all
cores. They should all have the same value (usually 0) or at least have a
very minimal delta. If that's off by more than 1us then something is fishy
especially on single socket systems. We could at least WARN about it.

We could do this in idle occasionally as well, so we can detect the dreaded
"SMI wants to hide the cycles" crapola.

Thanks,

	tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-14 01:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-20 12:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-20 12:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-20 21:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-21 07:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-21 10:10 +0200

csiph-web