Groups > linux.kernel > #1501903

Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?
Date	Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<steAx-2Ua-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <spcH0-6dt-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <spdjI-6HB-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <spjSa-2Un-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <ssOZs-3nb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ssWWZ-8mi-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <ssXgm-h3-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <st97Q-7NQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <staQi-wi-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <stbjk-YS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <stc5H-1vh-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <stcS6-1MH-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <ste7v-2Kh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <steAx-2Ua-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Provags-ID	V03:K0:YFlNKKN14lAtV7ggmKhXEAeL80zXhztXX6NR+HYR75uazaj5Gz8 gzqX1vZJxbIZ1JfC8omzM380o0XNlTmsHU/MC/VQ31Vyx7+rRyp5g4hF/wMPgtQx5iraHtq OVRcy+YqcBkAuoxLEkCL+Chawmy5P7PQxkOPjlu5auDjrjHDSaKCXwJH+U9DrTgdmL55a/3 BRT1j57ESwHsJKgaSJDgg==
X-Ui-Out-Filterresults	notjunk:1;V01:K0:KhAc7N8I2Bg=:4PPVapO4EvNdfWN5I6Mp+X BZCg4WxwHUuim4HomwCfnSXa9My/ZzvBU+jf2AYK8JqtJu0fxojnVQkzCd4e5NGgjSmZxUuPu 982fAU2Cj30NAW1UlECvKbpZCuAjNqmurgiUGTUyxrjKQnI7lLsYMhS/6JtoeCcl9IJE/cLRe Qu4BDzL0Nqjgs7608he3LATcrO4L8wAVSk+DGy3aoPqQy9VfK/RhXa+1JVMNK7zlWKi/etfyM rzcKtWlt7lMyMiMc77Uy9Jm+YOeb1Lc8VPLKH1r/8cT9pzGZ8QJEgyaihnHKs+Oh6YZmM71A0 s12b5O8X3FQuRRq9C0YVD4+IZu00+FuP0uCXmUHK0LsmpoekqcDIdeYRKwu0ICBGL3i86M1+v GIZq7XJnb+emfjfK/mh9WX1061j34Jb7NcdiJEwP6dEXhfMmk8ZvO8uJuu38JhUSPVRheyizE N+2Lx7OEhhiEl3Jb/DdpCBM22XdvYC0BNIOIA1RTyGz5mDLWu4mP2E6kLnEnD9WvEMQT7RPlA BVPaimo30Sb5flLPBZpfg7K5osIzVmAste3mJ9KVQ/w6QZul51v8bglazwbuIo+8DOTwkQZS0 Aq7sxV0JzsEmH4TMF+QTMBiVnT74vy4Vxpb92gFmTQpiv4OrJOhFRRoy6fQPuH+EKnjTt9Vu2 NPd2lzZA3j+y/+V9BHfdcAsI813TFoKelrT7fy+wQ65+IuhL4vTOpjcEPE6hz1D2OvJOoGIq9 xyiZ6RcaIL4JxsOfeZqkp3+AO3UvP/UqCC1+MUVXhtzJZtu/7p8K078RbBGu7T/tED4RnVoar waupRgj
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	14
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Joe Perches <coupons@perches.com>, Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org, ltp@lists.linux.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:43:14 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<97f31b70-e3ff-f194-c753-54da1fe3e664@users.sourceforge.net>
X-Original-References	<566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <92c52f1d-d151-cea6-e9ac-31378e6862d0@users.sourceforge.net> <1475771699.1914.10.camel@perches.com> <77fb6fdc-7480-8607-0af1-42f73c125b9d@users.sourceforge.net> <688764a4-072d-2faf-37ba-a222b190a5d9@suse.de> <59d71170-c48d-a084-c748-b6ab74a2bee4@users.sourceforge.net> <1e151094-e228-5307-ae2f-b376b31f5628@suse.de> <83e720c6-9037-a3c1-6e83-27505805f37f@users.sourceforge.net> <2cc42b2f-1f1a-e95c-91fa-54e1dd3b6d49@suse.de> <653e60ee-f862-8828-3e4f-498c7cc34bdc@users.sourceforge.net> <c2500336-5848-66c3-ecf0-1ade04decf75@suse.de> <a0f96e19-fa24-8507-2b77-344a342113aa@users.sourceforge.net> <1476703920.2520.105.camel@petrovitsch.priv.at>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1501903

Show key headers only | View raw

>>> See above. At the moment _any_ test result from your side would do.
>>
>> I imagine that another single result might not be representative.
> 
> Publish not only results but also everything (complete!) so that anyone
> can *easily* follow it to check and reproduce the results - especially
> if you want people with knowledge of other architectures to comment
> (otherwise they probably won't bother).

Am I the only software developer so far who would dare to reconsider
implementation details from three status functions?

Regards,
Markus

Thread

[PATCH] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-16 10:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-16 19:00 +0200
    Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-16 19:20 +0200
      Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-16 19:20 +0200
      Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 08:00 +0200
        Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 09:50 +0200
          Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 10:20 +0200
            Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 11:10 +0200
              Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 12:00 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 13:20 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 13:50 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 16:10 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 16:40 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 17:40 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 18:10 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 19:20 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-18 20:30 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-20 14:30 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> - 2016-10-17 14:20 +0200
                Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 16:10 +0200

csiph-web