Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1501904
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts |
| Date | 2016-10-17 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <steAx-2Ua-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <ssVxT-7xJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <stbCF-15W-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <stc5H-1vh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <stc5H-1vh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <stehb-2NB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:27:08PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: > On 10/17/2016 11:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:01:13AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >>On the top of that, it's incorrect C according to the standard. > > > >According to the standard non of the kernel has any chance in hell of > >working, so don't pretend you care about that :-) > > I think that's a bit of a false dilemma. It's obviously true that kernel > code does not conform to the standards, but that doesn't mean it's not > something we should strive towards or care about in general. It helps > static analysis tools, compiler diversity, etc. Sure, but this, two separately allocated objects their address should not be compared and therefore... stuff is explicitly relied upon by the kernel in many places. We have workarounds in various places, and this patch adds yet another instance of it. The workaround is simply confusing the compiler enough to have it not do the 'optimization'. But we very much still rely on this 'undefined' behaviour. I think it makes more sense to explicitly allow it than to obfuscate our code and run the risk a future compiler will see through our tricks. I don't see how its different than explicitly disabling the strict-aliasing muck, explicitly allowing (and 'defining') signed and pointer overflow, doing all the concurrency stuff on our own (gnu89 emphatically does _not_ have a memory model) etc.. And given GCC7 is still in development, this might be a good time to get a knob added for our benefit. Are we 'modifying' the C language, sure, but that ship has sailed long ago.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 17:30 +0200
[PATCH 07/12] tracing: declare __{start,stop}_ftrace_enum_maps as external array Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 17:30 +0200
[PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-10-17 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-17 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> - 2016-10-17 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-17 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-17 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-17 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-18 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-10-18 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> - 2016-10-19 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-19 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> - 2016-10-19 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-19 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> - 2016-10-19 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-19 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/12] extarray: define helpers for arrays defined in linker scripts Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> - 2016-10-19 16:50 +0200
[PATCH 12/12] dynamic debug: declare table as external array Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 17:30 +0200
[PATCH 10/12] serial_core: declare __earlycon_table{,_end} as external array Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 08/12] tracing: declare __trace_bprintk_fmt/__tracepoint_str as external arrays Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 09/12] tracing: declare __{start,stop}_syscalls_metadata as external array Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-10-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-10-16 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-10-17 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> - 2016-10-17 08:30 +0200
csiph-web