Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1501527
| From | Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions |
| Date | 2016-10-16 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ssWWZ-8mi-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <spcH0-6dt-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <spdjI-6HB-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <spjSa-2Un-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <ssOZs-3nb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/16/2016 10:20 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 10:10:28 +0200 > > A single character (a closing square bracket) should be put into a sequence > at the end in these functions. > Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc". > > This issue was detected also by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > --- > drivers/md/raid1.c | 2 +- > drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +- > drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > index 1961d82..fd97f65 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static void raid1_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev) > rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_"); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > - seq_printf(seq, "]"); > + seq_putc(seq, ']'); > } > > static void raid1_error(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c > index be1a9fc..7490b28 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c > @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static void raid10_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev) > seq_printf(seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_"); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > - seq_printf(seq, "]"); > + seq_putc(seq, ']'); > } > > /* check if there are enough drives for > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c > index 92ac251..9eb45c4 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c > @@ -7077,7 +7077,7 @@ static void raid5_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev) > seq_printf (seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_"); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > - seq_printf (seq, "]"); > + seq_putc(seq, ']'); > } > > static void print_raid5_conf (struct r5conf *conf) > The point of this patch being ... what? Does it improve code? Does it improve anything? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-16 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-16 19:00 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-16 19:20 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-16 19:20 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 08:00 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 09:50 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 10:20 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 11:10 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 12:00 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 13:20 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 13:50 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 16:10 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 16:40 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 17:40 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-17 18:10 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 19:20 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-18 20:30 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-20 14:30 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> - 2016-10-17 14:20 +0200
Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2016-10-17 16:10 +0200
csiph-web