Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock runs in suspend

From	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock runs in suspend
Date	2016-10-13 12:30 +0200
Message-ID	<srLqW-2eM-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<soCtP-6h4-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	ARM Ltd

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue,  4 Oct 2016 11:12:09 -0700
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:

> The ARM ARM specifies that the system counter "must be implemented in an
> always-on power domain," and so we try to use the counter as a source of
> timekeeping across suspend/resume. Unfortunately, some SoCs (e.g.,
> Rockchip's RK3399) do not keep the counter ticking properly when
> switched from their high-power clock to the lower-power clock used in
> system suspend. Support this quirk by adding a new device tree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock runs in suspend Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-10-04 20:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in system suspend Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-10-04 20:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in  system suspend Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-05 00:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock  runs in suspend Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-05 00:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock  runs in suspend Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-10-13 12:30 +0200

csiph-web