Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1495620

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in system suspend

From Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in system suspend
Date 2016-10-05 00:20 +0200
Message-ID <soGe6-jc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <soCtP-6h4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <soCtP-6h4-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
> The "arm,no-tick-in-suspend" property was introduced to note
> implementations where the system counter does not quite follow the ARM
> specification that it "must be implemented in an always-on power
> domain".
>
> Particularly, RK3399's counter stops ticking when we switch from the
> 24MHz clock to the 32KHz clock in low-power suspend, so let's mark it as
> such.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---
> v2: new in v2
>
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock runs in suspend Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-10-04 20:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in system suspend Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2016-10-04 20:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: arch counter doesn't tick in  system suspend Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-05 00:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock  runs in suspend Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2016-10-05 00:20 +0200

csiph-web