Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1490092
| From | Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() |
| Date | 2016-09-23 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skyRQ-4e3-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <skc4W-6RE-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <skiN3-2zX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <skt5L-GK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sktyN-Qs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <skuuR-1sk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23 September 2016 at 09:50, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> Markus, please contact the list in advance in future before posting a bunch >> of patches that don't fix any problems. > > I am trying to improve various open issues also in Linux source files. > That the fact that you see issues (in these particular cases) while others do not indicates that the commit summary could be explained better. A good commit summary should provide enough information to do that and make people _want_ the patch. From my limited experience through your patches (just skimmed a few) you seems to be describing what the patch does as opposed to why it does it and why should one find it interesting/wanted. You might want to read through the following [1] [2] and many others that exist out there. -Emil [1] http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/ [2] http://who-t.blogspot.fi/2009/12/on-commit-messages.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
[PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-09-22 12:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 15:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2016-09-22 17:50 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 19:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2016-09-22 22:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-09-22 22:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> - 2016-09-23 09:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 10:00 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 11:00 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 15:40 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 16:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 10:50 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 10:40 +0200
[PATCH 3/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Improve a size determination in qxl_driver_load() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
[PATCH 4/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Adjust checks for null pointers in three functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
csiph-web