Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1489521
| From | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() |
| Date | 2016-09-22 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <skiN3-2zX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sk5G9-2NH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sk5G9-2NH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sk9gJ-51T-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <skc4W-6RE-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:11:25PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > If you restricted yourself to fixing bugs only then you would maybe fix more > > bugs than you introduce but as it you are making the kernel worse. > > Would you like to discuss the statistics for my failure (or success) rate > a bit more so that involved issues can be clarified in a constructive way? It should be that you target 20 bug fixes for each new regression that you add. Since you are just sending clean ups, every bug you introduce sets us further and further back. There is no hope for improving the kernel because you are not even trying to fix 20 bugs, only introducing them. Once you fix 20 bugs, then you will be even and you can start sending cleanups again. This is fair. regards, dan carpenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
[PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-09-22 12:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 15:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2016-09-22 17:50 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 19:20 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> - 2016-09-22 22:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-09-22 22:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> - 2016-09-23 09:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 10:00 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 11:00 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 15:40 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 16:30 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 10:50 +0200
Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-23 10:40 +0200
[PATCH 3/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Improve a size determination in qxl_driver_load() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
[PATCH 4/4] GPU-DRM-QXL: Adjust checks for null pointers in three functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-22 08:30 +0200
csiph-web