Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1478717

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:49:31 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 02:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:35:50 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 17:22 -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please let me know what you think and if you can run some
> > > > > benchmarks you
> > > > > care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way
> > > > > or
> > > > > another),
> > > > > please do that and let me know what you've found.
> > > > 
> > > > LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the
> > > > intel_pstate ones).
> > > > 
> > > > I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android
> > > > audio,
> > > > video or
> > > > idle usecases on my hikey 96board.
> > > Did you see any performance regression on Android workloads?
> > 
> > That's with schedutil and IOwait boost.  Why would performance
> > regress?
> Some Android tests reach thermal limits and aggressive throttling
> causes performance issues. 

I see, OK.

Thanks,
Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use average P-state in get_target_pstate_default() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/4] cpufreq / sched: SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag to indicate iowait condition "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4]  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:10 +0200
  RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4]  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-09-07 17:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 02:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
        Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 03:20 +0200
            Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 17:00 +0200
              Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 19:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 21:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 21:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200

csiph-web