Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1475520
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil |
| Date | 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sd7tn-6DI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Everyone, This is a new version of the "iowait boost" series I posted a few weeks ago. Since the first two patches from that series have been reworked and are in linux-next now, I've rebased this series on top of my linux-next branch. In addition to that I took the Doug's feedback into account in the intel_pstate patches [2-3/4]. Please let me know what you think and if you can run some benchmarks you care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way or another), please do that and let me know what you've found. Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use average P-state in get_target_pstate_default() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/4] cpufreq / sched: SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag to indicate iowait condition "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:10 +0200
RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-09-07 17:30 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 02:30 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:50 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 03:20 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 17:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 21:30 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 21:50 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
csiph-web