Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1475520

[RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil
Date 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
Message-ID <sd7tn-6DI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Everyone,

This is a new version of the "iowait boost" series I posted a few weeks
ago.  Since the first two patches from that series have been reworked and
are in linux-next now, I've rebased this series on top of my linux-next
branch.

In addition to that I took the Doug's feedback into account in the
intel_pstate patches [2-3/4].

Please let me know what you think and if you can run some benchmarks you
care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way or another),
please do that and let me know what you've found.

Thanks,
Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use average P-state in get_target_pstate_default() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/4] cpufreq / sched: SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag to indicate iowait condition "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4]  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:10 +0200
  RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4]  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-09-07 17:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 02:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
        Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 03:20 +0200
            Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 17:00 +0200
              Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 19:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 21:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 21:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200

csiph-web