Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1478695

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil

From Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil
Date 2016-09-08 02:30 +0200
Message-ID <seVo6-754-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sd7tn-6DI-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please let me know what you think and if you can run some benchmarks you
> care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way or another),
> please do that and let me know what you've found.

LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the
intel_pstate ones).

I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android audio, video or
idle usecases on my hikey 96board.

thanks,
Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use average P-state in get_target_pstate_default() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/4] cpufreq / sched: SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag to indicate iowait condition "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Add iowait boosting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:00 +0200
  [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4]  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-03 03:10 +0200
  RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/4]  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change P-state selection algorithm for Core "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-09-07 17:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 02:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200
        Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 02:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 03:20 +0200
            Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 17:00 +0200
              Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 19:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-09-08 21:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in  intel_pstate and schedutil Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-09-08 21:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-09-08 02:40 +0200

csiph-web