Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1473060
| From | "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt |
| Date | 2016-08-31 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sc7lL-7js-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sbIGJ-8hw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbN3I-2x1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbOCt-3C0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbP5v-41d-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbPoR-47R-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Marc & Mark: 在 2016/8/30 19:21, Mark Rutland 写道: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> +Mark >> On 30/08/16 11:35, majun (F) wrote: >>> 在 2016/8/30 16:50, Marc Zyngier 写道: >>>> On 30/08/16 05:17, MaJun wrote: >>>>> From: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com> >>>>> >>>>> During system booting, if the interrupt which has no action registered >>>>> is triggered, it would cause system panic when try to access the >>>>> action member. >>>> >>>> And why would that interrupt be enabled? If you enable a PPI before >>>> registering a handler, you're doing something wrong. >>> >>> Actually,the problem described above happened during the capture >>> kernel booting. >>> >>> In my system, sometimes there is a pending physical timer >>> interrupt(30) when the first kernel panic and the status is kept >>> until the capture kernel booting. >> >> And that's perfectly fine. The interrupt can be pending forever, as it >> shouldn't get enabled. >> >>> So, this interrupt will be handled during capture kernel booting. >> >> Why? Who enables it? >> >>> Becasue we use virt timer interrupt but not physical timer interrupt >>> in capture kernel, the interrupt 30 has no action handler. >> >> Again: who enables this interrupt? Whichever driver enables it should be >> fixed. > > I'm also at a loss. > > In this case, arch_timer_uses_ppi must be VIRT_PPI. So in > arch_timer_register(), we'll only request_percpu_irq the virt PPI. > arch_timer_has_nonsecure_ppi() will be false, given arch_timer_uses_ppi > is VIRT_PPI, so in arch_timer_starting_cpu() we'll only > enable_percpu_irq() the virt PPI. > > We don't fiddle with arch_timer_uses_ppi after calling > arch_timer_register(). So I can't see how we could enable another IRQ in > this case. > > Looking at the driver in virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c, we only enable what > we've succesfully requested, so it doesnt' seem like there's an issue > there. > >>From a quick look at teh GIC driver, it looks like we reset PPIs > correctly, so it doesn't look like we have a "latent enable". > I just checked the status of irq 30 during capture kernel booting. The irq 30 status is: mask, pending after arch_timer_starting_cpu() called. Because irq 30 triggered only 1 time during capture kernel booting, I think this problem maybe happened in the case like: 1:irq 30 triggered, but not acked by cpu yet. 2:local_irq_disable() called 3:system reboot -->capture kernel booting 4:local_irq_enable() 5:irq 30 acked by CPU. Is this case possible? Thanks MaJun > Thanks, > Mark. > > . >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt MaJun <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-08-30 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-08-30 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-08-31 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-31 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-09-01 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-02 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-09-02 17:50 +0200
[tip:irq/core] genirq: Robustify handle_percpu_devid_irq() tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-09-02 18:20 +0200
csiph-web