Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1473060

Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt

From "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt
Date 2016-08-31 08:40 +0200
Message-ID <sc7lL-7js-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sbIGJ-8hw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbN3I-2x1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbOCt-3C0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbP5v-41d-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbPoR-47R-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Marc & Mark:

在 2016/8/30 19:21, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:07:36PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> +Mark
>> On 30/08/16 11:35, majun (F) wrote:
>>> 在 2016/8/30 16:50, Marc Zyngier 写道:
>>>> On 30/08/16 05:17, MaJun wrote:
>>>>> From: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> During system booting, if the interrupt which has no action registered
>>>>> is triggered, it would cause system panic when try to access the
>>>>> action member.
>>>>
>>>> And why would that interrupt be enabled? If you enable a PPI before
>>>> registering a handler, you're doing something wrong.
>>>
>>> Actually,the problem described above happened during the capture
>>> kernel booting.
>>>
>>> In my system, sometimes there is a pending physical timer
>>> interrupt(30) when the first kernel panic and the status is kept
>>> until the capture kernel booting.
>>
>> And that's perfectly fine. The interrupt can be pending forever, as it
>> shouldn't get enabled.
>>
>>> So, this interrupt will be handled during capture kernel booting.
>>
>> Why? Who enables it?
>>
>>> Becasue we use virt timer interrupt but not physical timer interrupt
>>> in capture kernel, the interrupt 30 has no action handler.
>>
>> Again: who enables this interrupt? Whichever driver enables it should be
>> fixed.
> 
> I'm also at a loss.
> 
> In this case, arch_timer_uses_ppi must be VIRT_PPI. So in
> arch_timer_register(), we'll only request_percpu_irq the virt PPI.
> arch_timer_has_nonsecure_ppi() will be false, given arch_timer_uses_ppi
> is VIRT_PPI, so in arch_timer_starting_cpu() we'll only
> enable_percpu_irq() the virt PPI.
> 
> We don't fiddle with arch_timer_uses_ppi after calling
> arch_timer_register(). So I can't see how we could enable another IRQ in
> this case.
> 
> Looking at the driver in virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c, we only enable what
> we've succesfully requested, so it doesnt' seem like there's an issue
> there.
> 
>>From a quick look at teh GIC driver, it looks like we reset PPIs
> correctly, so it doesn't look like we have a "latent enable".
> 

I just checked the status of irq 30 during capture kernel booting.

The irq 30 status is: mask, pending after arch_timer_starting_cpu() called.
Because irq 30 triggered only 1 time during capture kernel booting,
I think this problem maybe happened in the case like:
1:irq 30 triggered, but not acked by cpu yet.
2:local_irq_disable() called
3:system reboot -->capture kernel booting
4:local_irq_enable()
5:irq 30 acked by CPU.

Is this case possible?

Thanks
MaJun

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> .
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi interrupt MaJun <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-08-30 06:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-08-30 12:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 13:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 13:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-08-31 08:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-31 10:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 10:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-09-01 11:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for  ppi interrupt Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-02 15:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] generic: Add the exception case checking routine for ppi  interrupt Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-09-02 17:50 +0200
                [tip:irq/core] genirq: Robustify handle_percpu_devid_irq() tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-09-02 18:20 +0200

csiph-web