Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1472601

Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

From Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs
Date 2016-08-30 18:10 +0200
Message-ID <sbTLQ-75T-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sbfv3-6Ra-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan
<maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include
> platform specific PMU registers.
>
> Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch
>
> It's a perennial request from hardware folks to be able to
> see the raw values of the pmu registers. Partly it's so that
> they can verify perf is doing what they want, and some
> of it is that they're interested in some of the more obscure
> info that isn't plumbed out through other perf interfaces.
>
> Over the years internally we have used various hack to get
> the requested data out but this is an attempt to use a
> somewhat standard mechanism (using PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR).
>
> This would also be helpful for those of us working on the perf
> hardware backends, to be able to verify that we're programming
> things correctly, without resorting to debug printks etc.
>
> Mechanism proposed:
>
> 1)perf_regs structure is extended with a perf_arch_regs structure
> which each arch/ can populate with their specific platform
> registers to sample on each perf interrupt and an arch_regs_mask
> variable, which is for perf tool to know about the perf_arch_regs
> that are supported.
>
> 2)perf/core func perf_sample_regs_intr() extended to update
> the perf_arch_regs structure and the perf_arch_reg_mask. Set of new
> support functions added perf_get_arch_regs_mask() and
> perf_get_arch_reg() to aid the updates from arch/ side.
>
> 3) perf/core funcs perf_prepare_sample() and perf_output_sample()
> are extended to support the update for the perf_arch_regs_mask and
> perf_arch_regs in the sample
>
> 4)perf/core func perf_output_sample_regs() extended to dump
> the arch_regs to the output sample.
>
> 5)Finally, perf tool side is updated to include a new element
> "arch_regs_mask" in the "struct regs_dump", event sample funcs
> and print functions are updated to support perf_arch_regs.
>

I read the patch series and I have one suggestion to make.  I think we
should not use 'arch regs' to refer to these pmu registers.  I think
architectural registers typically refer to the ones that hold the
state of the process.  Can we replace arch_regs by pmu_regs, or some
other choice?

Thanks
Nilay

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
  [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to perf_regs structure Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to  perf_regs structure kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-29 01:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to  perf_regs structure Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-01 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to perf_regs  structure Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-06 06:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to  perf_regs structure Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-06 11:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to perf_regs  structure Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-09 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH 08/13] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf_arch_regs for newer Power processor Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
  [PATCH 04/13] perf/core: Extend perf_output_sample_regs() to include perf_arch_regs Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 04/13] perf/core: Extend perf_output_sample_regs() to  include perf_arch_regs Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 18:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 04/13] perf/core: Extend perf_output_sample_regs() to  include perf_arch_regs Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-01 05:50 +0200
  [PATCH 02/13] perf/core: Extend perf_sample_regs_intr() to include perf_arch_regs update Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
  [PATCH 12/13] tool/perf: Add perf_arch_reg mask and arch_reg_names structure Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-08-28 23:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-01 05:10 +0200

csiph-web