Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1471257

Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init()

From Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init()
Date 2016-08-28 02:50 +0200
Message-ID <saWsp-36o-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <satJM-22D-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <satJM-22D-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <savsd-2Z5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sawxX-3Rz-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <saFUC-1uq-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 09:02 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > If you _really wanted to clear up this code and make it more
> > robust/better, it'd probably be nicer to convert the
> > struct list_head **sn_irq_lh to a single struct list_head *
> > That would be less data space overall given the alignment
> > waste of the individual allocs.
> Does this suggestion mean that I should drop my proposal
> around the software components "IRQ" and "TLB" for the system
> architecture "IA64" in such a questionable patch series?

While elimination of code duplication should be good,
what it means it you should avoid making changes that
are merely mechanical and strive to make changes that
improve code execution speed or reduce overall object
size while not impacting overall execution speed.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/5] IA64: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:10 +0200
  [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-08-26 22:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-26 23:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-27 09:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-28 02:50 +0200
            Re: IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-28 09:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-08-28 11:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
      Re: IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-27 08:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-26 22:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> - 2016-08-27 10:50 +0200
  [PATCH 2/5] IA64-IRQ: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/5] IA64-IRQ: Delete unnecessary braces kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-26 22:30 +0200
  [PATCH 5/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 5/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-26 22:50 +0200
      Re: ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-27 09:30 +0200
  [PATCH 3/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Fix indentation in ia64_global_tlb_purge() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
  [PATCH 4/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Use kmalloc_array() in ia64_itr_entry() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200

csiph-web