Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471257
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() |
| Date | 2016-08-28 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <saWsp-36o-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <satJM-22D-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <satJM-22D-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <savsd-2Z5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sawxX-3Rz-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <saFUC-1uq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 09:02 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > If you _really wanted to clear up this code and make it more > > robust/better, it'd probably be nicer to convert the > > struct list_head **sn_irq_lh to a single struct list_head * > > That would be less data space overall given the alignment > > waste of the individual allocs. > Does this suggestion mean that I should drop my proposal > around the software components "IRQ" and "TLB" for the system > architecture "IA64" in such a questionable patch series? While elimination of code duplication should be good, what it means it you should avoid making changes that are merely mechanical and strive to make changes that improve code execution speed or reduce overall object size while not impacting overall execution speed.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] IA64: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-08-26 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-26 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-27 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-28 02:50 +0200
Re: IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-28 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-08-28 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-27 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-26 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() walter harms <wharms@bfs.de> - 2016-08-27 10:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/5] IA64-IRQ: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/5] IA64-IRQ: Delete unnecessary braces kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-26 22:30 +0200
[PATCH 5/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-08-26 22:50 +0200
Re: ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-27 09:30 +0200
[PATCH 3/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Fix indentation in ia64_global_tlb_purge() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
[PATCH 4/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Use kmalloc_array() in ia64_itr_entry() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-08-26 20:20 +0200
csiph-web