Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1555797
| From | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: Introduce rcuwait |
| Date | 2017-01-10 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sY9uV-4ME-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sRf2p-3NJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXMRH-7CY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/09, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Gents, any further thoughts on this? Both look correct to me, and I think this allows us to make more optimizations in percpu-rwsem.c. I am not sure about the naming... Yes, it relies on rcu but this is just implementation detail. But this is cosmetic and I can't suggest something better than rcuwait. Well, speaking of naming, rcuwait_trywake() doesn't look good to me, rcuwait_wake_up() looks better, "try" is misleading imo. But this is cosmetic/subjective too. Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: Introduce rcuwait Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-01-09 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: Introduce rcuwait Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-01-10 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: Introduce rcuwait Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-01-10 20:40 +0100
csiph-web