Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1529016
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path |
| Date | 2016-11-24 07:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGVy1-7hz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sDHhT-2vk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDHhU-2vk-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGUiB-65P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 24-11-16, 05:53, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Firstly, please start changes to scheduler code with a verb. This title: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path > > is totally inadequate as it's a statement that says nothing about the _change_. > > What does the patch do? Does it add, remove, modify, fix or clean up? Thanks for the tip. I have sometimes seen similar subjects-line in patches from core developers and so thought it might be right. But yes I understand what you are saying and will take care of this in future across all subsystems. > * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Execute the irq-work specific initialization/exit code only when the > > fast path isn't available. > > Is this an optimization? A correctness fix? Its an optimization but yeah I will try to explain a bit more next time. -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V2 0/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
[PATCH V2 2/4] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
[PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-24 07:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 07:30 +0100
[PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-16 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-11-24 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-24 06:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-24 05:10 +0100
csiph-web