Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1529016

Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path

From Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path
Date 2016-11-24 07:20 +0100
Message-ID <sGVy1-7hz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sDHhT-2vk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDHhU-2vk-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGUiB-65P-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 24-11-16, 05:53, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Firstly, please start changes to scheduler code with a verb. This title:
> 
>   Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path
> 
> is totally inadequate as it's a statement that says nothing about the _change_.
> 
> What does the patch do? Does it add, remove, modify, fix or clean up?

Thanks for the tip. I have sometimes seen similar subjects-line in patches from
core developers and so thought it might be right. But yes I understand what you
are saying and will take care of this in future across all subsystems.

> * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Execute the irq-work specific initialization/exit code only when the
> > fast path isn't available.
> 
> Is this an optimization? A correctness fix?

Its an optimization but yeah I will try to explain a bit more next time.

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH V2 0/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
  [PATCH V2 2/4] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
  [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only used in slow path Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only  used in slow path Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 06:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only  used in slow path Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-24 07:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: irq-work and mutex are only  used in slow path Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 07:30 +0100
  [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-15 09:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue  to SCHED_FIFO task Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-16 16:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-11-24 02:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue  to SCHED_FIFO task Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-11-24 06:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue  to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-24 06:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue  to SCHED_FIFO task Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 04:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue  to SCHED_FIFO task Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-24 05:10 +0100

csiph-web