Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1519325
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX SOC |
| Date | 2016-11-10 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sC3wd-2e1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sxAsN-5HA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxAsN-5HA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sC0RN-ke-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:54:06PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/uncore/uncore_cavium.c b/drivers/perf/uncore/uncore_cavium.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..a7b4277 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/perf/uncore/uncore_cavium.c > > + * Some notes about the various counters supported by this "uncore" PMU > > + * and the design: > > + * > > + * All counters are 64 bit long. > > + * There are no overflow interrupts. > > + * Counters are summarized per node/socket. > > + * Most devices appear as separate PCI devices per socket with the exception > > + * of OCX TLK which appears as one PCI device per socket and contains several > > + * units with counters that are merged. > > As a general note, as I commented on the QC L2 PMU driver [1,2], we need > to figure out if we should be aggregating physical PMUs or not. > > Judging by subsequent patches, each unit has individual counters and > controls, and thus we cannot atomically read/write counters or controls > across them. As such, I do not think we should aggregate them, and > should expose them separately to userspace. I thought each unit was registered as a separate PMU to perf? Or are you specifically commenting on the OCX TLK? The comment there suggests that the units cannot be individually enabled/disabled and, without docs, I trust that's the case. Will
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> - 2016-10-29 14:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: perf: Cavium ThunderX OCX TLK uncore support Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> - 2016-10-29 14:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX SOC Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> - 2016-10-29 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX SOC Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-11-09 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX SOC Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX SOC Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-11-10 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] arm64: perf: Basic uncore counter support for Cavium ThunderX SOC Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-11-11 12:20 +0100
[PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: perf: Cavium ThunderX L2C CBC uncore support Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> - 2016-10-29 14:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: perf: Cavium ThunderX LMC uncore support Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> - 2016-10-29 14:00 +0200
csiph-web