Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1452686
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues |
| Date | 2016-07-30 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s0CY1-3f0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rXtHz-4Eb-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXtHA-4Eb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s0oV4-2yr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <s0qNb-3H7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s0sch-4Rx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:20:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 19:50:59 -0500 > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > > > BTW, it would be really nice if ftrace_graph_ret_addr() were idempotent > > so we could get the "real" return address without having to pass in a > > state variable. > > > > For example we could add an "unsigned long *retp" pointer to > > ftrace_ret_stack, which points to the return address on the stack. Then > > we could get rid of the index state variable in ftrace_graph_ret_addr, > > and also then there would never be a chance of the stack dump getting > > out of sync with the ret_stack. > > > > What do you think? > > > > I don't want to extend ret_stack as that is allocated 50 of these > structures for every task. That said, we have the "fp" field that's > used to check for frame pointer corruption when mcount is used. With > CC_USING_FENTRY, that field is ignored. Perhaps we could overload that > field for this. In that case, I guess we would need two versions of ftrace_graph_ret_addr(), with the current implementation still needed for mcount+HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST. Or would you want to get rid of HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST for x86? BTW, on a different note, should I put ftrace_graph_ret_addr() to kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c so other arches can use it? -- Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-30 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-30 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-30 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-30 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-01 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-01 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-02 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-02 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-03 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-03 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-03 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-03 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-03 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-03 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-03 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-01 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-01 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-01 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-01 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/19] x86/dumpstack: fix function graph tracing stack dump reliability issues Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-08-01 18:50 +0200
csiph-web