Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1395193
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events |
| Date | 2016-05-05 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rvtxE-2sD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rv5vk-4VB-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rv5vk-4VB-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvtnY-2lG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvtxE-2sD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 5 May 2016 11:32:51 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > Think about it, what's the difference if the interrupt came in just > before the trace or just after? It still came in the same location with > respect to the normal flow of the code. The only difference is, where > we recorded it. Also, if we used a temp buffer for each one, the same thing would happen. The interrupt would be committed first before returning back to the interrupted event. Perf does the same thing, but all the time. -- Steve
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-05-04 16:00 +0200
Re: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 17:30 +0200
Re: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-05-05 17:40 +0200
Re: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-05-05 17:40 +0200
Re: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 17:50 +0200
csiph-web