Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs

From	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs
Date	2016-05-06 23:00 +0200
Message-ID	<rvV0S-3D7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rpQdz-yF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rte02-4gY-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rteCJ-4XO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:21:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, April 29, 2016 04:08:16 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
...
> > Any clue, why we don't have a non-SMP version of irq_work_queue_on(), Which can
> > simply call irq_work_queue() ?
> 
> Because nobody else needs it?
> 
> But I agree that it would be nicer to add the stub to irq_work.h.

I had wondered the same myself and figured there had to be a good reason why it didn't exist.

But if not, and it's preferred to add it, I'll go ahead and so.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq  callbacks on remote CPUs Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-29 12:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-29 13:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq  callbacks on remote CPUs Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-05-06 23:00 +0200

csiph-web