Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1377123

Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/12/2016 02:06 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/11/2016 10:08 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this patch (now commit
>>> 8c058b0b9c34d8c8d7912880956543769323e2d8) causes a regression on Xen
>>> when running on top of QEMU: the number of PIT irqs get set to 0 by
>>> probe_8259A but actually there are 16.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how to fix this?
>>>
>>> 1) we could revert 8c058b0b9c34d8c8d7912880956543769323e2d8
>>> 2) we could introduce an 'if (!xen_domain())' in probe_8259A
>>> 3) suggestions welcome
>> Stefano, do you have b4ff8389ed14b849354b59ce9b360bdefcdbf99c ?
>>
>> It was supposed to fix this problem for Xen. However, I just noticed that
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h makes nr_legacy_irqs() return 0 (unlike
>> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h). Could that be the problem?
> I have b4ff8389ed14b849354b59ce9b360bdefcdbf99c but it doesn't fix the
> issue for me.
>
> Is the idea of your patch that xen_allocate_irq_gsi will allocate the
> descriptor dynamically instead?

Right.

> If so, it doesn't work because it
> doesn't get called for irq 14:

So how has it worked until now then?

>
> piix_init_one -> ata_pci_sff_activate_host -> devm_request_irq ->
> devm_request_threaded_irq-> request_threaded_irq -> irq_to_desc(14) ->
> -EVAIL
>
> If you look at pci_xen_initial_domain, the loop:
>
> for (irq = 0; irq < nr_legacy_irqs(); irq++) {
>
> won't work anymore because by the time is called, nr_legacy_irqs()
> already returns 0, because it has been changed by probe_8259A().
>
> We also need the following patch:
>
> ---
>
> xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests
>
> b4ff8389ed14 is incomplete: relies on nr_legacy_irqs() to get the number
> of legacy interrupts when actually nr_legacy_irqs() returns 0 after
> probe_8259A(). Use NR_IRQS_LEGACY instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> index beac4df..6db0060 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
>   	__acpi_register_gsi = acpi_register_gsi_xen;
>   	__acpi_unregister_gsi = NULL;
>   	/* Pre-allocate legacy irqs */
> -	for (irq = 0; irq < nr_legacy_irqs(); irq++) {
> +	for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY; irq++) {
>   		int trigger, polarity;
>   
>   		if (acpi_get_override_irq(irq, &trigger, &polarity) == -1)


Won't we need the same change in the 'if (0 == nr_ioapics)' clause?

-boris

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before  allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 04:10 +0200
  Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2016-04-12 10:40 +0200
  Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 15:30 +0200
    Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 20:10 +0200
      Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 21:10 +0200
        Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 23:20 +0200
          Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 23:40 +0200
            Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 00:40 +0200
              Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-13 01:20 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 03:30 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 19:40 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 21:20 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-04-14 00:30 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-14 00:40 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-14 14:50 +0200
      Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-04-14 15:50 +0200
        Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-14 16:50 +0200

csiph-web