Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1378326

Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:

> On 04/13/2016 01:36 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > On 04/12/2016 09:27 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > On 04/12/2016 07:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > > > On 04/12/2016 05:56 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > >    I am not sure, maybe you didn't have CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ?
> > > > > > But I am certain that 4.6-rc2, with the attached config, fails as
> > > > > > Dom0
> > > > > > on QEMU with the following sequence of calls:
> > > > > I did have CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ and I just rebuilt 4.5.0 with your config
> > > > > (4.6-rc3 doesn't build for me for some reason) and that booted dom0 as
> > > > > well.
> > > > > 
> > > > > BTW, what do you mean by "dom0 on QEMU"?
> > > >   I am running Xen and Linux inside a QEMU x86_64 emulated machine
> > > > (nested
> > > > virt).
> > > 
> > > This I, of course, never tried.
> > > 
> > > But given that things work in a single-level virt, doesn't this imply that
> > > perhaps there is something in the emulation that's not quite right?
> > 
> > OK, so this *is* broken on single level virt as well. It's just that we
> > always end up using AHCI so lack of irq 14 (and 15) does not affect the
> > system. And I guess in QEMU case it's IDE only, right?
> > 
> > You patch does fix this but I wonder if we could change something in
> > probe_8259A() so that we can continue using nr_legacy_irqs(). Using
> > nr_legacy_irqs() and NR_IRQS_LEGACY at the same time is inconsistent and may
> > cause us headaches in the future.
> > 
> 
> I think we could use paravirt_has() feature that was added for similar reason
> when we had a problem with RTC (commit
> d8c98a1d1488747625ad6044d423406e17e99b7a). So we add paravirt_has(PIC) which
> will only be set by dom0 and then probe_8259A() will not set legacy_pic to
> null_legacy_pic when this flag is set.

Maybe we could introduce a legacy_pic_xen in arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c or
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c? We could set legacy_pic = legacy_pic_xen from
start_kernel, so that we can skip probe_8259A completely.

 
> Note that paravirt_has() is being removed by
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01415.html so
> presumably we'd use new struct x86_legacy_features instead (copying Luis so
> that if this is acceptable he could add it to his next spin).

I would prefer to come up with a fix that is backportable to 4.3, 4.4
and 4.5.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before  allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 04:10 +0200
  Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2016-04-12 10:40 +0200
  Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 15:30 +0200
    Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 20:10 +0200
      Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 21:10 +0200
        Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 23:20 +0200
          Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 23:40 +0200
            Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 00:40 +0200
              Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-13 01:20 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 03:30 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 19:40 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-13 21:20 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-04-14 00:30 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-14 00:40 +0200
                Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-14 14:50 +0200
      Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-04-14 15:50 +0200
        Re: Xen regression, Was: [PATCH] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence  before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-14 16:50 +0200

csiph-web