Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1356532
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken |
| Date | 2016-03-12 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rbXRE-2KY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <rbS5A-6Sv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbSoV-7fy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbSIi-7nR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbSRX-7sY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rbT1D-7xk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am fine with either way, and I will prepare one patch and let Jens
> decide.
So guys, this needs to be done *now*.
And Jens - this is the last time I believe you when you say late
patches are required.
The buggy patch that introduced this problem was part of that very
late pull request that I already rejected once, and you then claimed
was absolutely required.
So the dicking around with the block layer stops *now*.
Seriously. I'm pissed off.
I don't want to see anything even half-way questionable during the
whole next release window. Not even during the merge window. You need
to do some serious quality control, and re-think the whole "large
changes" model.
Linus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:50 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org> - 2016-03-12 09:10 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 09:50 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 10:30 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 11:40 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 13:20 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 14:40 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 14:50 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:10 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:30 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:40 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:50 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-12 21:00 +0100
Re: e827091cb1 "block: merge: get the 1st and last bvec via helpers" broken Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-03-12 22:20 +0100
csiph-web