Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1425004

Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool

From "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool
Date 2016-06-17 14:30 +0200
Message-ID <rL14l-6sY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rKkiJ-3Lp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKkiJ-3Lp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKsgh-wr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKXtM-49O-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-06-17 04:30, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hi Minchan,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:42:07PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>> Change zram to use the zpool api instead of directly using zsmalloc.
>>> The zpool api doesn't have zs_compact() and zs_pool_stats() functions.
>>> I did the following two things to fix it.
>>> 1) I replace zs_compact() with zpool_shrink(), use zpool_shrink() to
>>>    call zs_compact() in zsmalloc.
>>> 2) The 'pages_compacted' attribute is showed in zram by calling
>>>    zs_pool_stats(). So in order not to call zs_pool_state() I move the
>>>    attribute to zsmalloc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
>>
>> NACK.
>>
>> I already explained why.
>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160609013411.GA29779@bbox
>
> This is a fair statement, to a certain extent. I'll let Geliang speak
> for himself but I am personally interested in this zram extension
> because I want it to work on MMU-less systems. zsmalloc can not handle
> that, so I want to be able to use zram over z3fold.
I concur with this.

It's also worth pointing out that people can and do use zram for things 
other than swap, so the assumption that zswap is a viable alternative is 
not universally correct.  In my case for example, I use it on a VM host 
for temporary storage for transient SSI VM's.  Making it more 
deterministic would be seriously helpful in this case, as it would mean 
I can more precisely provision resources on this particular system, and 
could better account for latencies in the testing these transient VM's 
are used for.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool Dan Streetman <dan.streetman@canonical.com> - 2016-06-15 17:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-06-16 01:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 10:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-06-20 10:10 +0200

csiph-web