Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1416058

Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order"

From Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order"
Date 2016-06-07 13:40 +0200
Message-ID <rHnwu-25S-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rHe9Q-4nr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHlEm-Wz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHlXH-13D-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHm7n-1lU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHmK6-1z7-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


2016-06-07 19:48 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>:
> On 2016-06-07 12:03, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2016-06-07 18:58 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>:
>>> On 2016-06-07 11:38, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>> On 2016-06-07 03:38, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I recently noticed that alternating between "make" and "make targz-pkg"
>>>>> rebuilds the whole Kernel. This was not happening before. As a Kernel
>>>>> developer, my build/install/test environment heavily relies on the fact
>>>>> that "make targz-pkg" only quickly generates the tarball if everything
>>>>> is already built, so this change is heavily impacting my development
>>>>> environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did some bisection and concluded that the first bad commit is:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit 9c8fa9bc08f60ac657751daba9fccf828a36cfed
>>>>> Author: Masahiro Yamada
>>>>> Date:   Sat May 7 15:48:26 2016 +0900
>>>>>     kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order
>>>>>
>>>>> I also verified that if I just revert this commit on top of the
>>>>> most recent tree it goes back to the usual behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> I read the commit message and it seems that some unneeded rebuilds are
>>>>> somewhat expected, but I can't understand why such a change in the
>>>>> command line like the one I did triggers everything to be rebuilt.
>>>>> IMHO, it really shouldn't. I also wonder that maybe the regression I'm
>>>>> experiencing was not expected in the original change, so maybe there's
>>>>> a way to keep the original improvement caused by the mentioned patch
>>>>> without the regression I'm experiencing.
>>>>>
>>>>> How to reproduce (exact commands I used at every bisect step):
>>>>>
>>>>> $ make tinyconfig
>>>>> $ time make -j4 V=2 # this should build things
>>>>> $ time make -j4 V=2 # just to make sure nothing will be rebuilt
>>>>> $ time make -j4 V=2 targz-pkg
>>>>
>>>> I can reproduce it.
>>>
>>> Try the attached patch.
>>>
>>> Michal
>>>
>>
>>
>> Right.
>>
>> I had already sent a similar patch.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9159863/
>
> I see. I hadn't read all my mail before replying.
>
>
>> My concern is it is effectively
>> reverting e8f5bdb02ce0.
>> I hope Rik can comment on that.
>
> My patch just resets NOSTDINC_FLAGS before including the arch Makefile.
>

Ah, I missed that, sorry.

Then, yours should be no problem.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-06-07 03:40 +0200
  Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-07 11:40 +0200
    Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> - 2016-06-07 12:00 +0200
      Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-06-07 12:10 +0200
        Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> - 2016-06-07 12:50 +0200
          Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-06-07 13:40 +0200
            Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-06-07 16:20 +0200
              Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-08 00:00 +0200
                Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider  argument order" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-06-09 01:30 +0200

csiph-web